Vox Popoli


Hillary appears to have Parkinson’s Disease That is the conclusion of a a board-certified Anesthesiologist with 36 years of experience, backed up by the observations of a) a victim of Parkinson’s Disease and b) a registered nurse who cares for patients with Parkinson’s Disease.

HRC probably has PD.

She has had clinical symptoms for a minimum of 4 years, and probably much longer, given that the fall leading to her head injury required a significant progression of the disease. All of her bizarre physical actions since that time fit nicely into the spectrum of signs that we expect in PD. And since PD explains all of them, we have a high probability of a correct diagnosis. It has almost certainly been treated with levodopa. Some of her symptoms may be related to this drug treatment.

It is most curious that all of the bizarre physical signs seem to be in 2016 videos. HRC was a public figure in 2015, with a lot of campaign work underway. Yet all of the oddities seem to be within the last several months. This suggests a significant progression of her PD. We also know that her contact with the public has been rigidly controlled. She has not done news conferences during the campaign. These would be highly stressful to a PD sufferer and would elicit many PD signs.

PD is a chronic disease with a downhill prognosis. HRC’s instability and frequent cough suggest that her PD is advanced. This is not a good outlook for someone running for the Presidency. The office of the President is one of the highest stress jobs in the world. Stress sets off PD episodes, which render the sufferer incapable of proper response.

At this point, a bit of speculation seems appropriate. HRC talks about her yoga sessions. But no one we know of has ever documented one. It is possible that this is cover for sessions designed to teach her coping mechanisms for PD or for rest breaks. Exhaustion makes PD worse.

HRC’s coughing suggests that her swallowing disorder is advanced, placing her closer to an aspiration pneumonia that would disable or kill her. That’s bad enough, but PD has one more, even more dangerous step in its progression.

Read the whole thing at Mike Cernovich’s place. This is more than a meme, it is a medical observation by an expert. It is increasingly obvious to even the most casual observer that something is seriously wrong with Hillary Clinton, and given what appears to be her rapid decline, it’s probably not something that the media can conceal for much longer the way they did with Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and John F. Kennedy.

Mike also noted on Twitter that the treatment for dysphagia is the use of thickened liquids, which explains why Hillary has been observed refusing bottles of water in favor of specially prepared glasses.

Source: Vox Popoli

Hillary Clinton KNEW her aides were working with family foundation despite her pledge not to – and she even hosted dinner at her home for the charity when in office

  • Clinton’s closest State Department aides were closely involved in projects with Clinton Foundation, according to emails released Tuesday
  • This was despite ethics agreements intended to create a firewall between Clinton’s office and family’s foundation
  • Emails released by Citizens United show aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills were in regular contact with foundation officials
  • Topics of correspondence ranged from programming at Clinton Global Initiative events to Bill Clinton’s public remarks
  • Clinton signed ethics agreement saying she wouldn’t be personally involved in state department matters related to foundation
  • But State Department said her closet staffers were bound by no such restrictions 

Emails released by the watchdog group Citizens United on Tuesday show Clinton aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills were in regular contact with foundation officials on topics ranging from the programming at Clinton Global Initiative events to Bill Clinton’s public remarks.

While Clinton signed an ethics agreement saying she would not be personally involved with State Department matters related to the Clinton Foundation, her closest staffers were bound by no such restrictions, according to the State Department.

Hillary Clinton's closest State Department aides were closely involved in projects with the Clinton Foundation, according to emails, despite ethics agreements  intended to create a firewall between Clinton's office and her family's foundation

Hillary Clinton’s closest State Department aides were closely involved in projects with the Clinton Foundation, according to emails, despite ethics agreements intended to create a firewall between Clinton’s office and her family’s foundation

‘Secretary Clinton’s ethics agreement at the time did not preclude other State Department officials from engaging with or having contact with the [Clinton] Foundation,’ said spokesperson Mark Toner during the State Department press briefing on Monday.

Toner was commenting on phone logs from Cheryl Mills’s office that were published this week, which showed Mills corresponded extensively with the Clinton Foundation’s chief operating officer.

Clinton signed an ethics agreement before taking office in which she said she would ‘not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter involving specific parties in which the William J. Clinton Foundation (or the Clinton Global Initiative) is a party or represents a party’ unless she applied for and received a waiver under conflict-of-interest laws.

Although there are debates over what constitutes ‘personal and substantial’ involvement under ethics laws, emails from Clinton’s aides indicate that she was aware of her staffer’s involvement with CGI and Clinton Foundation matters.

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Quiet Revolutions ~ boiling the frogs slowly

The ‘pooper-scooper’ [Scoop] has been trying to make some scatological sense out of the filth that we now live in. Heaven only knows that we are literally up to our eyeballs in specimens that more properly belong in a society that has a strange obsession with coprophilia. But what is trash [or waste] for some, has always been a treasure to others I suppose. Or, as they say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

It seems a quiet revolution occurred during my lifetime which was punctuated every now and then by a few uprisings or notable tectonic societal shifts. These usually died down though the inevitable aftershocks reverberated within our societies for decades.

We all know how to desensitize a frog to boiling them alive [by raising the temperature degree by degree] so that they scarcely realize that they are not enjoying a nice warm bath . . . until it is too late of course. Or perhaps it is similar to those born into a life that is filled with filth and yet are not aware that life is not ‘normal.’ After all, it is normal for them . . . a new normal; like these children perhaps?

Something similar has happened in the political, ideological and religious arena that can only be viewed as a complete disaster and deconstruction of a positive, values-based society. I should say, the ‘new normal’ has values but not the positive ones that we began with. They have been remade and reconstituted according to a perceived higher ideological end.

Take, for instance, the moment when Barack Obama made his infamous statement that small town folks, “cling to guns or religion” which made it more than obvious that our new President didn’t think too highly of our rights to own guns or our penchant for a society based on Christian values. Then last year, Hillary who has a very good chance of becoming our next president said: “religious beliefs have to be changed.” Why? because religions are opposed to her unassailable belief in a woman’s right to an abortion. So Hillary claims preeminence over God in such things. And in the Catholic arena, Pope Francis has taken mercy to the point where his version is better than Christ’s or the teachings of the Church he is leading. For where Christ was clear regarding adultery, our Pope has now made illusory . . . hidden in a fog of mumbo jumbo.

What is to be made of this new one-world-order crowd or one-world-church crowd? We have compromised away our positive values for expediency. We have ‘grown’ in our acceptance of transgenders, homosexuality, abortions, adultery, illegal border crossings [a borderless world in the vision of Soros is now acceptable to most]. Pragmatism and utilitarianism has beat down our God-given constitutional rights and back-shelved our moral beliefs and even our common sense. We are only months away from our Pope celebrating the reformation and the life of Martin Luther . . . how does that speak to the heroes of our faith during those times?

My friend Steve recently asked me if I could ever be friends with a liberal. I did not even hesitate: the answer is no. They are my enemies and they wish to extinguish my rights, expunge my beliefs and take my money and redistribute it in the name of ‘fairness’ and ‘mercy’. How can you call someone who wishes you ill, your friend? It seems impossible to me.

I think it’s becoming a little warm in this pot of water that we are now sitting in. Perhaps we ought to think more about this whole societal remake before we are too weak to jump out of the pot.

I’m not sure what answer you would give Steve but I think there may be another post in the offing regarding his question.

The Power of One

News for Catholics: Editorial or a Post

By Steve Brown


This has to be the story of the day, week, and probably many days till November.

I heard someone comment the other day, that we are living in the era of “the power of one.” Now think about that. Here we have a person living in the Ecuadorian embassy in London controlling the actions of the DNC (who fired their leader), Hillary and her campaign, and President Obama (who both issued statements of praise for Debbie Wasserman Schultz).

Hillary’s minions have now stated that the Russians are coming, the Russians are coming!

They, so they say. are the ones behind this dastardly deed of releasing private emails that help that scoundrel Trump!

Oooooo, did Trump pay the Russians, or did they do it just for chuckles! But, surely the DNC is smarter than that, so this must be a well orchestrated misdirection. What does Hillary have to hide, other than we all know (the list being longer than my endurance) by throwing Debbie under the bus? Ahhhh, Hillary paid the Russians!

Well, the Russians could have paid Assange. Follow the money!

Julian Assange stated, well, you can read it for yourself.  What, where, who, how, and when?

What do you think?

Finally a Republican (Other Than Me) Tells the Truth About Hillary Clinton – The Rush Limbaugh Show

Finally a Republican (Other Than Me) Tells the Truth About Hillary ClintonJune 22, 2016 BEGIN TRANSCRIPTRUSH:  Well, I have to tell you, my email is overflowing with people calling Trump’s speech a home run.  People are saying, “Finally! It’s about time somebody started telling the truth about Hillary Clinton, and it’s not you.  Finally somebody that’s an official Republican starts telling us what we already know!” People are jazzed by this, according to my email and other feedback that I’m getting. We’ve got all the audio sound bites coming. Of course, I, as a powerful, influential member of the media, had a transcript of the speech before it was given.

It happens it was a speech given on the prompter today down at SoHo, one of Trump’s hotels that he owns.  So Trump basically said things about Hillary Clinton that you just don’t hear Republicans saying.  You’ve heard them before.  You’ve heard them on this program, of course.  You’ve probably heard similar things that Trump said in other areas.  But you just do not hear Mitt Romney say this, for example.  You wouldn’t hear the Bush family talk this way about Hillary.  You wouldn’t. You just wouldn’t hear it.

Source: Finally a Republican (Other Than Me) Tells the Truth About Hillary Clinton – The Rush Limbaugh Show

Hillary raises money off Orlando terrorist attack – The American MirrorThe American Mirror

via Hillary raises money off Orlando terrorist attack – The American MirrorThe American Mirror

Margaret Sanger Desanitized – Truth and Charity Forum

Margaret Sanger passed away in the year 1966, one week before her 87th birthday. Though she was an atheist, funeral services were held at the Episcopal Church in Tucson, Arizona where she was eulogized as a “good, fighting saint who experienced martyrdom.” The Reverend George Ferguson went on to say that “all the elements of sainthood were personified many times in her life.”

The made-for-television movie, Choices of the Heart: The Margaret Sanger Story (1995) is a highly sanitized version of Sanger as a champion for women’s rights. New York Times television critic, John J. O’Connor, stated that the movie describes an “extraordinary woman whose contraception crusade eventually led to the founding of Planned Parenthood.” Upon accepting the Planned Parenthood Margaret Sanger Award in 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton offered high praise to the award’s namesake: “Now I have to tell you that it was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision . . . . I am really in awe of her.” The sentiments of admiration expressed by Clinton were shared by H.G. Wells: “The history of our generation when it is written will be a biological history and Margaret Sanger will be its heroine.”

Read more . . .